Topic: I have the worst best academy... That sucks. (Read 13213 times)

LieCheatNsteal · « **Reply #25 on:** January 21, 2015, 02:51:48 AM »

btw does any of u guys felt the longer the "Remaining time to show report" the "AVERAGE" quality the peeps will get better?

leonhart · « **Reply #26 on:** January 21, 2015, 03:57:16 AM »

Quote from: Kr10s on January 20, 2015, 10:36:53 PM

In other words, TB academy is not "the investment", its my "investment focus", if you use it right you will surely cover maintenance fees, some profit from players and maybe some really good players, you need to have some luck too.

really agree with u

and another important point, dont promote too much players without getting their report first. So its between u spent money to get instant report, or wait until the report finish. well, this is only my hypothesis after all, since I never get good enough players when I try to promote players early (the best was x/6/5 some years ago with G academy). after I chose to wait report, I got some LA 6-7 with G academy, and even got 2 LA 8 2 season ago and 3-5 LA 7 in a season with VG academy. I'll wait (too) for this season report for my TB academy, just hope my 10M investment will produce some great players

marctiello · « **Reply #27 on:** January 21, 2015, 10:52:00 PM »

Mmmm... My friend from Portguese league, last season pulled out 3 LA10 players. Of course he was pulling into Academy each week three players...so part it is just lucky and part it is statistics (and G's)...

Kr10s · « **Reply #28 on:** January 23, 2015, 09:39:50 AM »

I have the feeling that academy youth are younger, could it be true? Today i added another 2 extra youth to my academy, and again, they are younger than 17 years old!
Since the season started, i had 13 youth players in total (8 basic, 5 extra), only 3 of them were 17 years old, the others are younger, so after pulling 5 players, i still can pull another 2... I have 8 players in academy now and i after pulling the remaining 2 i will have 6 players with report at hand, ready to be promoted next season.
I always invest some money in extra youth, but having so many 15/16 years old youth never happened to me before, how about you guys?

Andy · « **Reply #29 on:** January 23, 2015, 11:35:51 AM »

Well my original 8 were: 3 x 18 yr olds, 4x 17 yr olds and 1 x 16 yr old
my extras so far are 1 x 17 yr old and 2 x 16 yr olds

I dont know if this different to last year or not.

shomyguca · « **Reply #30 on:** January 23, 2015, 11:43:38 AM »

Quote from: Kr10s on January 23, 2015, 09:39:50 AM

I have the feeling that academy youth are younger, could it be true? Today i added another 2 extra youth to my academy, and again, they are younger than 17 years old!
Since the season started, i had 13 youth players in total (8 basic, 5 extra), only 3 of them were 17 years old, the others are younger, so after pulling 5 players, i still can pull another 2... I have 8 players in academy now and i after pulling the remaining 2 i will have 6 players with report at hand, ready to be promoted next season.
I always invest some money in extra youth, but having so many 15/16 years old youth never happened to me before, how about you guys?

I have completely opposite feeling. My youths:

promoted:
M L/AM RL, 17

still waiting reports:
M C,16
GK, 17
GK, 18
M R, 19
D C, 18
M C, 18
D R,DM R, 17
D C, 17
D C, 19
AM R, 19

chuncho_ · « **Reply #31 on:** January 23, 2015, 11:53:09 AM »

is true also I've noticed, and I've seen in transfers before was common to see players 18-19 years, now I think there is hardly 19 years, and were more than 15-16 years, who were formerly very few

Drahcir · « **Reply #32 on:** January 23, 2015, 11:56:23 AM »

I Don't know, but here are my prospects:

15 mc/amc - pulled
16 mc - pulled

16 aml
17 dl/dml
18 gk
17 dr/dmr
17 mc
17 mr
17 dmc
17 gk
15 mc
16 dmc/mc

lordaust · « **Reply #33 on:** January 23, 2015, 12:24:49 PM »

17, Timian Østvold, D C: 2-3/9-10/4-6
17, Tage Halle, F C 3-3/10-11/3-4
17, Christoffer Prestø, F C 3-3/9-11/4-6
16, Arthur Steen Larsen, M C,AM RC 2-3/9-9/4-5
16, Ken Vang, D L: 2-3/8-11/2-6
17, Egil Kristoffersen, D C: 4-5/7-9/6-8
18, Gjuro Kashov, DM C: 2-3/8-9/2-3
18, Pål Espen Backmann, DM C: 1-3/9-12/2-4
15, Torbjørn Soltun, M L: 3-4/10-10/4-4

lordaust · « **Reply #34 on:** January 23, 2015, 12:26:18 PM »

The ca/la/pr might no be accurate, but its what I expect to see.

Red · « **Reply #35 on:** January 23, 2015, 02:35:21 PM »

I have also more young boys than before but it is my first season with best academy...
But the way, I have a question: Is scout level give us better report of youth players in academy ? Is there any way to get better report.I mean more precise. $:-\$

Kr10s · « **Reply #36 on:** January 23, 2015, 02:43:51 PM »

Nope, reports are inacurate, no matter how good your scout is.

marctiello · « **Reply #37 on:** January 23, 2015, 08:11:06 PM »

Wow Lordaust!!!! My Best level academy gave this season at least 5 LA6-7 players...

i fired them all....
i got also 2 3/9/3 ---> to the transfer market and selling them for just 1M

the kast player is a 15y GK LA5-6 ....

Bad luck this season, hope next season it will be better!

Harper · « **Reply #38 on:** January 23, 2015, 08:32:10 PM »

Well, i have best academy for few seasons, never had any 10 LA. In current season best player i got is x/7/5;].

panjcof · « **Reply #39 on:** January 23, 2015, 09:55:42 PM »

Lordaust you are the luckiest guy in GKO world. My best players were LA7 with the best academy

Duongspy · « **Reply #40 on:** March 15, 2015, 12:31:47 PM »

Can you believe your eyes ? This youth players from the Best Academy

Each season, I have to spend about 6 million or more to search new players
I only get some players (3-4/9/3)
So I should invest in my academy or youth camp $:-\$

Roostophe · « **Reply #41 on:** March 15, 2015, 02:02:04 PM »

I've had similar players of LA 5, 6 or 7 from my 'Best' academy since I upgraded. I've also had far too many DC's and MC's.

Fortunately, I got very lucky this season and got a couple of pearls. So good, in fact, I've already had someone messaging me asking if one player was for sale - JUST HOURS AFTER I PROMOTED HIM FROM MY ACADEMY.

Brian Clough · « **Reply #42 on:** March 16, 2015, 05:20:42 PM »

Quote from: Duongspy on March 15, 2015, 12:31:47 PM

Each season, I have to spend about 6 million or more to search new players
I only get some players (3-4/9/3)
So I should invest in my academy or youth camp $:-\$

Well, for 6 million/season I'd guess you can get 4 LA8-10 players, or 2 LA9-13 players per season from youth camps, depending on whether you put the money into one or two youth camps. This is in addition to whatever your academy yields.

For me, these options will yield about the same number of LA9+ players (on average) per season. However, if obtaining LA11+ players is your priority, the youth camp option is clearly the better choice since I don't believe these come from academies.

Andy · « **Reply #43 on:** March 16, 2015, 06:51:56 PM »

Quote from: Brian Clough on March 16, 2015, 05:20:42 PM

However, if obtaining LA11+ players is your priority, the youth camp option is clearly the better choice since I don't believe these come from academies.

Hi Brian, just to let you know: you are not correct in this statement. for example, there are 5 English players with LA>10 (2x LA12 and 3 x LA11) and all 5 came from Academies.

Cheers

Ruta · « **Reply #44 on:** March 16, 2015, 07:47:18 PM »

Quote from: Brian Clough on March 16, 2015, 05:20:42 PM

Well, for 6 million/season I'd guess you can get 4 LA8-10 players, or 2 LA9-13 players per season from youth camps, depending on whether you put the money into one or two youth camps. This is in addition to whatever your academy yields.

For me, these options will yield about the same number of LA9+ players (on average) per season. However, if obtaining LA11+ players is your priority, the youth camp option is clearly the better choice since I don't believe these come from academies.

I don't agree if YC are better. I don't know any player from it who reached CA 10!

Diartt · « **Reply #45 on:** March 16, 2015, 08:31:38 PM »

Quote from: Ruta on March 16, 2015, 07:47:18 PM

I don't agree if YC are better. I don't know any player from it who reached CA 10!

yes there are lots of players who have reached ca 10 from YC . example- Adair Merricks (7105045) 10/10/4 , Enrique Puig (6722189) near ca 11 , etc ., but my opinion is that YC are more surely that you'll get player la 10 or more , but it has only ca 1 and that is very hard work to train him for 4 or 5 seasons , it takes long time to reach his La , so academy is way better if you have luck .

Ruta · « **Reply #46 on:** March 16, 2015, 09:04:33 PM »

thanks Diart

. So we have a few Ca 10 from YC

But as I see, they were farmed on loans and got a lot help from U21 and NT games. It is hard now to get help from NT for 1/10/4 cause all human teams have a lot better youth for training. More LA 10 at the most condition aren't enough to strengthen NT so 1/10/4 LA for u21 can't be useful either (cause of slow and long training).

Sopelana · « **Reply #47 on:** March 16, 2015, 09:07:07 PM »

Quote from: Ruta on March 16, 2015, 09:04:33 PM

thanks Diart . So we have a few Ca 10 from YC But as I see, they were farmed on loans and got a lot help from U21 and NT games. It is hard now to get help from NT for 1/10/4 cause all human teams have a lot better youth for training. More LA 10 at the most condition aren't enough to strengthen NT so 1/10/4 LA for u21 can't be useful either (cause of slow and long training).

Here you have one without the help of NT. Remenber that some positions are not used in bot NT:

http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=7165407

He is 8/10/4, but I will raise him to CA10.

Ruta · « **Reply #48 on:** March 16, 2015, 10:19:36 PM »

Quote from: Sopelana on March 16, 2015, 09:07:07 PM

Quote from: Ruta on March 16, 2015, 09:04:33 PM
thanks Diart . So we have a few Ca 10 from YC But as I see, they were farmed on loans and got a lot help from U21 and NT games. It is hard now to get help from NT for 1/10/4 cause all human teams have a lot better youth for training. More LA 10 at the most condition aren't enough to strengthen NT so 1/10/4 LA for u21 can't be useful either (cause of slow and long training).

Here you have one without the help of NT. Remenber that some positions are not used in bot NT:

http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=7165407

He is 8/10/4, but I will raise him to CA10.

still I can't see much sense in it

So much pain for so little gain:( Ca 9 at age 23 costs about 4 mln. Is it worth?

Lokk at him
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5733955
at 7,5 seasons I did LA8 to CA 10 http://i.imgur.com/aZQRLHS.png So more important is how fast you can use player without penalty for your team

Sopelana · « **Reply #49 on:** March 16, 2015, 11:28:16 PM »

I was training this last two seasons, so I was trying. I sold many LA10 from YC, and LA9,he stay with me because of position DMC. When I begun to buy nobody wanted to sell LA10, they were so strange in market. Now all people have LA10, so in market you can buy them.

News:

Author Topic: I have the worst best academy... That sucks. (Read 13213 times)