they deserve a solution, but it's hard to find who has to pay the new salary? cause when you got someone on a loan and they said that it's a wage, he has to play for that salary no more not less.....
Here you go:
1. Loan club forces Parent club to offer new contract. Contract is automatically renewed.
2. If wage changes, loan club has 3 days to either:
a) Agree to pay new wage --> player remains on loan
b) Refuse to pay new wage (default)
3. If refused, parent club gets 3 days to either:
a) Pay difference between new wage and old wage (default) --> player remains on loan, loan club pays only original salary
b) Cancel loan deal --> player returns to parent club
Refusing to pay new salary is risky since parent club may choose to end loan deal so they can sell the player
Defaults are if no choice is made after deadline. This way
For example:
1) A player gets loaned with wage 1,350/wk but becomes unhappy with contract. Loan club decides to force parent club offer new contract-->4,123/wk
2) Loan club decides new wage is too high (possibly constrained by wage limit), refuses to pay new wage
3) Parent club notified of this in club news. Parent decides loan is important, pays difference in salary (2,773/wk), player stays on loan, loan club pays original 1,350/wk