I think it would be interesting to know wich manager is behind each opinion, i mean... every single user has his opinion and i think that's great, but every user follow their own interest mostly, i mean, a newbie or a manager playing alone in his league thinks they are great to give them a chance against bigger teams and you know what? I don't think it's fair, not fair at all.
Isn't your team strong enough to compete with oponent's, do a proper managerial work, use a defensive formation, play direct passing, use counter attack, try to neutralize opponent key players.... there are many ways to compete without mots, the real problem is that many people doesn't get the basic, they don't know to develop their players, rarely read game manual and thinks has the mots option to cover their cons as managers.
What will people say? You don't know what if feels to play as the weaker team? Guys, i started 14th in D level (the lowest division available in Argentina) nobody gave me anything and i never used mots against a stronger team to take advantage, you have no idea how much satisfaction it brings.
Another thing came to my mind, and we spoke about it many times too: people say "there are many games to use mots, so there is a tactical factor involved on it", i want to remind you that people who plays WCC have far more matches to focus than just their 30 league matches, so their "tactical option" is a disvantage actually, if people would get league mots, cup mots and wcc mots (if they participate in it) then they would be playing under closer circumstances.