UNH

[Ologga]

ADMIN, signed players of last week continue with UNH status instead of have enough budget for renew their contracts, instead of have been bought last week by my team and in that moment the UNH status should have dissappeared, now are we going to play with that penalty in 1st league match?.

must we be always complaining about al kind of problems in this game?. Absolutely tired.

[Kr10s]

Offer them a new contract (again), that should fix it..... 

[Ologga]

Offer them a new contract (again), that should fix it..... 

yes, I know this trick but if the unhappy player's salary is biggest than the difference between my maximum salary allowed in the team and the current global salary that I pay to my players, the system says 'your budget is not enough' because think that is a new salary. an evident bug again, one more bug.

[Kr10s]

Are you absolutely sure that your player room allow you to offer a bigger contract? The "your budget is not enough" message shouldn't appear if your wage budget is enough.

[Ologga]

absolutely, another gko surprise.

[Ologga]

absolutely, another gko surprise.

as expected, no answer, no references, no explanation, nothing. not admin's or gko's problem.

[famouson17]

They are lot of things to need to be put in order

[Ologga]

I am quite sure that they even don't konw that this bug is happening.

[chefo]

Yep yep, im having the same problem with one of my new players :/

[Andy]

Me too.

Just for clarity: I have signed a new free player on a Salary of 9,200 he now wants another 1,000 a week. I have 4,000 a week budget left but when I try to resign him I am only allowed to offer a total salary of 4,000 a week (I should be allowed to offer 9,200+4,000 =13,200). Its as if the computer thinks I am signing a brand new player. This is a bug.

On the positive side at least the salary cap is working now, so managers can't offer players more than their play room maximum. I am now upgrading my player room - spomething I didnt have to even think abput before the new and more realistic wage demands.
 

[Ologga]

In my case my two affected players wants the same salary, an absolute absurd.

[Brian Clough]

absolutely, another gko surprise.

as expected, no answer, no references, no explanation, nothing. not admin's or gko's problem.

Oberstdorf, I see you are currently spending over 240,000G weekly on player wages, and salary cap for your okay player room is 250,000. Apparently you need to upgrade your player room to increase your weekly budget expenditures.

From the Game Manual (§10):

Level of player room affects wage budget as follows.

None --> 50000 G
level 1 --> 75000 G
level 2 --> 100000 G
level 3 --> 150000 G
level 4 --> 200000 G
level 5 --> 300000 G
level 6 --> 500000 G

and the update:

- Wage budget of the player room will be increased as follows

none  50,000-->50,000
Very Bad 75,000-->100,000
Bad 100,000-->150,000
Okay 150,000-->250,000
Good 200,000-->350,000
Very Good 300,000-->550,000
The Best 500,000-->800,000

[chefo]

I hope you fix this soon because I am forced to play league matches with UNH players, and its not because of a mistake of mine..

As others said above basically it counts the contract renewal as actually signing another player and wants the same amount available in the wage budget as it already takes..

[chefo]

- Wage budget of the player room will be increased as follows

none  50,000-->50,000
Very Bad 75,000-->100,000
Bad 100,000-->150,000
Okay 150,000-->250,000
Good 200,000-->350,000
Very Good 300,000-->550,000
The Best 500,000-->800,000

That doesnt really help much. I will have to give you an example so you understand it clearly :
You've signed a new player with 10k wage, you had 11k free wage budget (player room level 1)
That player has UNH status => you try to renew the contract and it says not enough budget (you have 1k wage budget left free) and basically it wants a whole another available 10k budget to renew the contract :/
See where the problem is? ^_^

[Brian Clough]

- Wage budget of the player room will be increased as follows

none  50,000-->50,000
Very Bad 75,000-->100,000
Bad 100,000-->150,000
Okay 150,000-->250,000
Good 200,000-->350,000
Very Good 300,000-->550,000
The Best 500,000-->800,000

That doesnt really help much. I will have to give you an example so you understand it clearly :
You've signed a new player with 10k wage, you had 11k free wage budget (player room level 1)
That player has UNH status => you try to renew the contract and it says not enough budget (you have 1k wage budget left free) and basically it wants a whole another available 10k budget to renew the contract :/
See where the problem is? ^_^

Still it is hard to tell whether this is a bug or not... I have purchased players from transfer market before and then they become UNH shortly after...for example, last season I bought a 5/7/5 player who wanted a new contract only a few weeks after signing...I have found that it is wise to buy a player that is growing quickly with only a 2 season contract since the player may become UNH with it shortly after signing, and sign a longer contract only after the player has reached his LA. Surely it is risky to maintain a wage budget that is more than 95% of limitation set by player room quality?

[Astonmk]

does [unh]  this affect player performances??

[Ologga]

does [unh]  this affect player performances??

it is an evident bug:

1st because I sign a player last week and he must arrive to the team without any unhappy status.

2nd because the player wants to receive THE SAME SALARY then if in this moment is enough my room, with the renew of the contract will continue being enough. The player wants to receive the same then I don't need improve any player room, I have enough budget. The problem I will say once again is the system thinks that a new salary is added and that is false.


It is an evident bug. As always admin ignoring the problem.


And yes, it affects reducing their performance.

[chefo]

Surely it is risky to maintain a wage budget that is more than 95% of limitation set by player room quality?

Well, that should be for the manager to decide. In my case the player was already at his limit so I didnt have to think in advance about him.

Anyway I think we are moving from the thread subject, it is a bug and needs attention asap..

[Ologga]

Surely it is risky to maintain a wage budget that is more than 95% of limitation set by player room quality?

Well, that should be for the manager to decide. In my case the player was already at his limit so I didnt have to think in advance about him.

Anyway I think we are moving from the thread subject, it is a bug and needs attention asap..

+1

[Brian Clough]

does [unh]  this affect player performances??

it is an evident bug:

1st because I sign a player last week and he must arrive to the team without any unhappy status.

2nd because the player wants to receive THE SAME SALARY then if in this moment is enough my room, with the renew of the contract will continue being enough. The player wants to receive the same then I don't need improve any player room, I have enough budget. The problem I will say once again is the system thinks that a new salary is added and that is false.


It is an evident bug. As always admin ignoring the problem.


And yes, it affects reducing their performance.

Thanks for clarifying the issue, it wasn't clear before 

[chefo]

BUMP

[zell]

seems like they already fix that issue....can check your player status now...

[Ologga]

seems like they already fix that issue....can check your player status now...

they have made nothing. everything continues like yesterday.

[chefo]

Yeah well I guess I'll have to play half season with UNH players now, GKO'd hard.

[Ologga]

Yeah well I guess I'll have to play half season with UNH players now, GKO'd hard.

I don't agree, they must solve this issue today, not tomorrow, today.