Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mihut

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
51
quite a few years have passed, with me taking a stand against cheating, voicing my opinion against it and sending reports to admin. this, certainly, pissed off the main gang of cheaters from Romania. so, this is what they've done:

- waited for me to transfer list a cheaper player

- took one of their multiaccounts and bought that player

- came out on the chat and spent the entire sunday, calling me a cheater and making up lies about me and my transfer:

* they said the player (http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5049643) is a "sixer", therefore, it cannot be fairly sold for that price. yes, the player is LA 6, but CA 8, full experience, level 72, in very good morale. if he were to be sold to a real team, not to their multiaccount, he would be a very useful gk. this season, his skills do not decrease, yet. only from the next season on, they will start to decrease, but he is good enough to spend 1 mil on the transfer.
*they said the other transfer i made on the same day, is a cheated transfer, because nobody pays 5 mil for a "niner". that player is a 9/10/1, trained to 947k estimated value, not too far from CA 10.
FC I N V I S I B L E , watch out, you are being called a cheater, on the Romanian chat, by zsoka's friends!
*they said most of my transfers a cheated. zsoka claims that every time i need money, i cheat on transfers. but i have over 24 mil and i never buy players. i spend money to bring extra youths in my academy, paying 300k per player. right now, i have money for 80 players, divided by 3 players per week (in case i would see the reports right away, but i don't), equals almost 27 weeks, assuming my weekly income would barely manage to balance the spending (and it's not the case, the weekly income is greater than the spending, even before champions cup and national cup matches)

another thing, about that gk: a few months ago, i had an offer for him. it started with 850k, i said it's not enough, he raised it to 1 mil, i said 1,3 mil, he agreed, but later, he must have changed his mind and didn't bid. this is the team that made the offer: http://www.gokickoff.com/team_overviews.php?club_id=234335 . therefore, the 1 mil price is justified, in my opinion.

and another thing: as soon as i saw the transfer and the team that bought the gk, i took the appropriate action, according to the rules:
http://forum.gokickoff.com/index.php?topic=7487.0
- 5. If a seller is innocent in (1-d), he must notify [email protected] after the transaction within 48 hours. If we believe that the seller is innocent he will be charge with (2-c) instead of (2-b).
even if i'm not involved in selling an unreasonably priced player, this is clearly a case of cheating, from the buyer, because that team bought the player with the sole intention of making me look as if i'd sell to a team created to buy players from me.

the admin replied, "we are checking", 2 days ago, but i can't just sit around, doing nothing, while the cheaters continue to post accusations on the Romanian chat.

this post is for non-cheaters, to see the real situation and my side of the story.

ADMIN, DO YOUR JOB!!! FASTER!!!


edit: i just checked my messages and saw that i had another offer for 1 mil, for that gk, but it was from a decent romanian user and i declined it, telling him that if i were to sell to a romanian user, we would both be accused of cheating, by zsoka's gang

52
Romania / trisorii au trecut la atac, cu transferuri
« on: July 10, 2016, 07:58:05 AM »
gasca cangrena a facut, in sfarsit, rost de bani sa ma atace, prin transferuri.

una din multele lor echipe a cumparat de la mine un portar, de nivel 72, cu 1 milion. http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5049643

ceea ce nu stiu ei, este ca eu am mai avut oferta pe el, de un milion, dar nu mi-a convenit, asa ca am cerut 1,3 mil. asta se intampla cu cateva luni in urma, cand celalalt portar al meu nu era crescut suficient, iar eu am ales sa nu mai listez portarul batran, pentru a-l putea folosi, la nevoie. cum l-am folosit doar o data, de atunci, am decis sa-l listez, din nou, de data asta, cu pretul care mi se oferise, 1 mil. moment bun, pentru trisori, sa sara la cumparaturi. daca ar fi fost un pic mai destepti sau daca nu ar fi fost asa de zgarciti, ar fi oferit peste valoarea de piata, pentru ca acel transfer chiar sa para trisat. dar asa se intampla, cand nu e suficienta materie cenusie.

iata conversatia avuta cu un user, care mi-a facut oferta de 1 mil pe acel portar:

Leighton Adamson (5049643)
From :  Juve Stabia
3 months ago
      ilija83  says : 
Leighton Adamson (5049643) 850 000 k maximum brather Ok ???
      Mihut  says : 
not enough
      ilija83  says : 
1 milion ? okk
      Mihut  says : 
1.3
      ilija83  says : 
ok, 1,3
      Mihut  says : 
ok

si iata cine este cel care mi-a facut oferta:
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_overviews.php?club_id=234335

eu am observat, de aseara, ca echipa care mi-a cumparat portarul este dubioasa, asa ca, imediat, am facut raport la admin:

some cheater team bought a player from me
People
<***@***.com>  Jul 9 at 11:09 PM
To   
Dave Dunn
CC   
Gokickoff - Let's Kickoff  Brad Dunn
Message body
hello!

according to the gko new rules: http://forum.gokickoff.com/index.php?topic=7487.0

5. If a seller is innocent in (1-d), he must notify [email protected] after the transaction within 48 hours. If we believe that the seller is innocent he will be charge with (2-c) instead of (2-b).


this is the player that was bought from my team, by a cheater team, but at a fair price: http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5049643

why do i say it's a fair price? because a few months ago, i had an offer from another team, for this player, but that team failed to bid and right after that, i stopped transfer listing my player. this is the conversation i had with that team, you may find it in my inbox, if you want to verify.

Leighton Adamson (5049643)
From :  Juve Stabia

      ilija83  says : 
Leighton Adamson (5049643) 850 000 k maximum brather Ok ???
      Mihut  says : 
not enough
      ilija83  says : 
1 milion ? okk
      Mihut  says : 
1.3
      ilija83  says : 
ok, 1,3
      Mihut  says : 
ok


why am i writing to you, since it's a fair price? because the cheaters' gang will start accusing me of cheating and i want to be able to say to them that i've reported this issue to you.

i would appreciate if you would check this transfer and clear me of any suspicion.

i'm waiting for your answer!
mihut

53
Romania / Re: ***** Votarea selectionerului *****
« on: July 06, 2016, 02:28:35 PM »
tu te-ai gasit sa vorbesti despre cresterea propriilor jucatori, la nationala? chiar nu ai pic de rusine?!


tu ai refuzat, sezonul trecut, sa cresti portari cu LA 8, pentru a-ti creste propriul portar, LA 7!

tu ai refuzat, sezonul trecut, sa cresti MC cu LA 12, pentru a-ti creste propriul MC, LA 9!

tu ai refuzat, sezonul trecut, sa cresti AML 10/10/6, pentru a creste fostul ML, AML, LA 9!


plus jucatorii gastii tale de trisori, pe care i-ai antrenat, in detrimentul unor jucatori mai buni sau cu potential mai mare. nu ai suficienta moralitate, pentru a veni aici si a posta! tu esti un trisor, care beneficiaza de manevrele cu multiconturi, ale gastii.

te-ai intrebat vreodata, daca userii romani isi doresc alegeri corecte, indiferent de cine iese selectioner? daca ei isi doresc sa iasa unul care nu va iesi niciodata din grupe, insa e user curat?

54

Also I ask the administrator To check on the person that  reported my case that he as well is doing irregularities as the rules suggests: - Trading players with friends, acquaintances or players within the same LAN is strictly prohibited. He has been loaning players to his friends all the time and every season.

loaning is not trading.


A premium users can loan out players to other clubs (premium users) and take players on loan form other clubs (premium users). Loan deals on the same LAN is permitted.(max 2 player per season)
taken from: http://www.gokickoff.com/prem_detail.php (premium features)

before accusing anyone, check to see if you are right! especially when you are the cheater

55
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: GOKICKOFF Records
« on: May 28, 2016, 06:08:21 PM »
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_match_detail.php?match_id=8532048
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_match_detail.php?match_id=11749649

the same team, twice playing mots, against normal, at home, in a league match and losing 6-0.

56
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: How do loans work?
« on: April 10, 2016, 08:26:29 PM »
you buy premium, then you are allowed to send 3 players on loan and take 2 players on loan.

the loan extends for the rest of the season, until the season reset.
the team that takes the player on loan, pays his salary, sets his training intensity, plays him in any match
the owner team sets the training type

57
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: cheater reporting
« on: April 10, 2016, 07:25:04 PM »
transfer history of RAPID OBSESION


5 transfers to Botev Plovdiv
2 transfers to San Martin Formosa
2 transfers to Boavista (LOCRI is the previous name of RAPID OBSESION)
3 transfers to Logrones
5 transfers to     Solin
4 transfers to Perak
2 transfers to     Hangzhou
5 transfers to     Turnovo
2 transfers to PRO Titan
2 transfers to Daegu
2 transfers to Admira Praha
1 transfer to Baloch
1 transfer to Al Sareeh
1 transfer to Vaduz
1 transfer to Roda JC (team that has switched it's focus on financing Spargatorul De Buci Arad - see previous post)
1 transfer to Novi Sad
1 transfer to Kocaelispor

plus 1 transfer each, to teams with only one player bought, ever:
 Durham
Paksi SE
FC Emmen
Hottin
Sousse Tigers
Senica
Bistrica
Halmstads BK
DC United
Valur
Fovu Club
CS Herediano

and many, many others. i got tired of all this copy-paste, here. in the last 2 years, almost all his transfers are cheated and the amount stolen is at least 39.000.000 G

apparently, his last honest transfer dates back to over a year ago.

notice the fact that almost all those teams were created in july-august 2013. that's 2 and a half years ago and he waited all this time to cash in!
by this method, he managed to upgrade quite a few facilities to the best.

this team is now banned. good job, Admin!

the latest development:
just now, the banned user showed up on the romanian chat, logged in on another team (he owns other teams, with premium), and claims that he is requesting his money back. not just the premium left, on the banned team, but the last 9 months of premium, on all the teams he owns!

imagine that! he stole, got caught, and now he wants someone else to pay for the things he did! these cheaters, they really have balls, don't they?

dozens and dozens of cheated transfers, but he still claims he is clean as a whistle! outrageous!

58
http://www.gokickoff.com/game_manual.php?show_f_lang_id=1


- When the 'current ability' of a player reaches his 'limited ability' or current ability is above or equal to 7, training will have no effect in improvement. Only by playing in matches will his skills improve.

59
now prove how i'm encouraging this team to cheat.

i don't transfer to this team or from this team, i don't ask this team to cheat.

60
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: cheater reporting
« on: April 02, 2016, 09:14:09 AM »
transfer history of RAPID OBSESION


5 transfers to Botev Plovdiv
2 transfers to San Martin Formosa
2 transfers to Boavista (LOCRI is the previous name of RAPID OBSESION)
3 transfers to Logrones
5 transfers to     Solin
4 transfers to Perak
2 transfers to     Hangzhou
5 transfers to     Turnovo
2 transfers to PRO Titan
2 transfers to Daegu
2 transfers to Admira Praha
1 transfer to Baloch
1 transfer to Al Sareeh
1 transfer to Vaduz
1 transfer to Roda JC (team that has switched it's focus on financing Spargatorul De Buci Arad - see previous post)
1 transfer to Novi Sad
1 transfer to Kocaelispor

plus 1 transfer each, to teams with only one player bought, ever:
 Durham
Paksi SE
FC Emmen
Hottin
Sousse Tigers
Senica
Bistrica
Halmstads BK
DC United
Valur
Fovu Club
CS Herediano

and many, many others. i got tired of all this copy-paste, here. in the last 2 years, almost all his transfers are cheated and the amount stolen is at least 39.000.000 G

apparently, his last honest transfer dates back to over a year ago.

notice the fact that almost all those teams were created in july-august 2013. that's 2 and a half years ago and he waited all this time to cash in!
by this method, he managed to upgrade quite a few facilities to the best.

this team is now banned. good job, Admin!

61
Romania / Re: lipsa echipa
« on: March 11, 2016, 02:53:34 PM »
echipa e alocata, liga nu este. nu prea ai ce face. dai un amical, o data pe saptamana.

ip-ul tau de acasa, nu este cel care apare pe joc. aici apare ca te loghezi de la adresa serverului, care e in dallas. lucru suspicios. de obicei, chestiile astea li se intampla celor care folosesc programe cu scopul de a-si ascunde adevarata identitate si de a-si crea zeci si zeci de echipe, pentru trisat. in plus, am mai vazut o echipa care semana cu asta, creata tot zilele trecute

62
Romania / Re: lipsa echipa
« on: March 11, 2016, 01:27:04 PM »
de obicei dureaza foarte mult, pana ti se aloca echipa. uneori si o luna.

cum se face ca ip-ul tau este adresa jocului? adica de dallas? nu cumva esti tu, mai JR?

63
Suggestions/Bugs / Re: Bug in player statistics
« on: March 10, 2016, 10:49:51 PM »
I think it happens only to players that were released on free before database backup has been done.

or maybe those lost and recovered

64
Romania / Sezonul 16, Nationala (lui) Under21
« on: March 04, 2016, 01:40:36 AM »
in primul rand, sa analizez conceptul de crescut juniori. exista mai multe variante:


1. abandonarea totala a unui mandat, din cauza lipsei de consistenta a lotului, adica posturile nu pot fi acoperite de jucatori care, la momentul meciurilor, nu vor fi CA 9-10, cu exceptia portarului, unde merge si un CA8. aceasta lipsa poate fi cauzata nu doar de lipsa juniorilor cu LA/PR mare, ci si de prezenta unor LA 10, spre exemplu, in echipe care nu au upgrade-uri ridicate, plus antrenori suficient de buni, combinata cu lipsa meciurilor, care duce la antrenare inceata si lipsita de experienta (poate proprietarul are jucatori mai buni, pe acel post).

ce e de facut? presupunand ca generatia urmatoare are deja jucatori potential mai buni, renunti la o campanie, adica un mandat, in favoarea cresterii generatiei urmatoare (cei de 17 si 18 ani, deci cei care vor prinde mondialul in mandatul urmator). formezi un lot complet, doar din ei si ii joci doar pe ei, 4 sezoane. incurajezi proprietarii sa-i joace cat mai mult, dandu-le meciuri la u21, ca stimulent (marea majoritate a userilor si-ar dori ca, in schimbul a 30 de minute in fiecare meci sau exceptand cateva derby-uri, sa primeasca aproape toate meciurile cu nationala mica). astia sigur trebuie sa fie cu CA>LA, in timpul mondialului si vor avea multa experienta.

e o varianta extrema si prezinta riscul de a-ti ridica in cap userii romani care nu inteleg ce se intampla, in afara de cei care sunt din tabara adversa. asta, cel mai probabil, va duce la pierderea alegerilor urmatoare (daca s-ar desfasura corect, nu ca la noi). pierzand alegerile, roadele le va culege altcineva, care va fi ridicat in slavi si ti se va spune constant ca asa se face treaba, cum a facut el, nu cum ai facut tu, desi el a beneficiat de munca ta.


2. abandonarea pozitiilor pe care nu le vei avea acoperite, in sezonul de mondial. aici e altfel si nu e asa extrem. stii ca sezonul viitor vei avea o serie de jucatori cu CA mare, care iti vor acoperi o parte din pozitii. ii joci, sa-i aduci la CA>LA si sa le dai experienta maxima. pe pozitiile descoperite, renunti la optarii disponibili si la nouarii care nu sunt antrenati si jucati din plin si le dai jaratec celor din generatia urmatoare, care sunt pe maini bune si chiar daca nu vor fi la fel de buni, macar vor salta nationala, in urmatorul mandat.

schema cu stimulatul proprietarilor ramane valabila si orice selectioner care se respecta, tine legatura cu proprietarii, incercand, daca e cazul, sa influenteze si modul in care este antrenat jucatorul.


3. combinarea performantei u21 cu antrenarea jucatorilor cu LA foarte mare (11 si 12), care nu joaca la NT. aici se iau jucatori cu LA 11 si 12 si se joaca, impreuna cu cei care vor juca la mondial.

de ce jucatori si nu jucatorii? pentru ca poti avea, de exemplu, un Musat Laurentiu, LA11 PR 3, care pare a fi un talent irosit. desi a fost extras la 17 ani, pana acum, la 20 de ani, abia a ajuns la (aproximativ) CA 7,5. el ar fi fost bun, in mainile cuiva care stie putina matematica si putin din regulile jocului, suficient incat sa-l antreneze la viteza maxima permisa de joc.

stiu, din proprie experienta, ca un jucator de 18 ani si jumatate (adica extras in vinerea dupa etapa 15), cu valoare 266k si PR 3, la extragere, poate creste pana la 598k, adica fix CA 7, in 1,5 sezoane, fara sa primeasca niciun meci la vreo nationala. Musat, intr-o perioada dubla si cu meciuri la nationale, a reusit sa ajunga doar la 686k.

din aceasta cauza, selectionerul poate trage concluzia, justificata, ca acest jucator va fi antrenat la fel de incet, in continuare. in consecinta, este inutil, la nivel de nationala, indiferent care dintre nationale. nu zic, exista sanse, ca el sa ajunga, probabil pe la vreo 23 sau 24 de ani, sa aiba CA>LA. din pacate, pentru el, exista alti 2 MC, care au atat LA, cat si CA, mai mare, deci nu prea are rost sa tragi de el, ca de un mort, la nationala mica. e mai benefic sa ii ajuti pe ceilalti 2.

am facut paranteza asta, pentru a intelege de ce nu toti jucatorii cu LA foarte mare pot fi luati in considerare. restul conceptului nu cred ca mai trebuie explicat.



acum sa revenim la oile noastre, adica sezonul 16 si Under21.

potrivit selectionerului, acum vrea sa incerce sa creasca potentialii internationali de tineret. ce inseamna asta? conform lotului actual, el va ignora aproape complet jucatorii care vor juca sezonul viitor, la mondial. zic 'aproape complet', deoarece exista, totusi, 2 jucatori de 20 de ani, in lot. deci e cam o ceata. nu e laie, nici balaie.

nu inteleg abordarea asta. de ce se lasa balta jucatorii care vor fi folositi sezonul viitor? indiferent cat de buni ar fi, pot fi si mai buni, cu ajutorul lui. de ce nu doreste sa participe, in niciun fel, la cresterea jucatorilor pe care se va baza, sezonul viitor? munca de selectioner nu consta in a astepta proprietarii sa-i daruiasca, de-a gata, tot lotul. trebuie sa puna si selectionerul umarul, in una din variantele explicate mai sus.

si sa nu credeti ca s-a apucat de crescut LA 11 si 12. Fulga Petre, 20 de ani, 12/4, care inca primeste antrenament, nu e in lot, dar pariez orice, ca va dori sa profite de el, sezonul viitor. cu Zanfir Patric, 19 ani, 11/4, aceeasi poveste.

si daca tot a spus ca vrea sa incerce sa creasca potentialii, Avramescu Darius, 18 ani, 5/11/3, chiar daca nu face parte din categoria jucatorilor pe care ii va dori, sezonul viitor, in mandatul urmator sigur va fi nevoie de el, asa ca este 'potential'. cu toate astea, nu este in lot.



am zis sa ma uit si pe jucatorii selectionati, sa vad cat de potentiali sunt. iata:


1. GK Dumitrascu Silviu 18 ani, 5/8/3, 2* experienta

pe pozitia asta, cel mai bun e Jitaru Iosif, 20 ani, 10?/10/4, 5*. e la NT si mi-e teama ca va face tusa. ramane de vazut. oricum, indisponibil pentru u21
ce altceva mai e, mai bun decat Dumitrascu?
Sava Banel , 19 ani, 8/8/3, 4*
Mogut Alexandru, 19 ani, 8/5, 1*, dar valoare cu aproape 100k peste Dumitrascu, PR mult superior

abia acum vine Dumitrascu, in ordinea LA

urmatorul e Suteu Horatiu, 19 ani, 8/8/3, 4* dar si el e mai bun
abia acum vine un portar inferior primului portar selectionat:
2. Ploesteanu Alberto, 17 ani, 7/4, 2*. chiar daca are un pic de valoare estimata, peste Dumitrascu, are LA inferior. totusi, ce il califica sa faca parte din lot, este faptul ca, surpriza: proprietarul este chiar selectionerul. din aceasta cauza, alti portari, net superiori, au fost ignorati. dar se va apela la ei, sezonul viitor.

3. DR Gherghina Adrian, 20 ani, 9/3, 5*
avem un DR 12/4, de 20 de ani, dar e la NT. vedem daca va face tusa.
daca tot a declarat ca va juca 'potentialii', ce-ar fi sa aduca unul care e si mai potential, pentru ca are LA mai mare si se incadreaza la regula conform careia el nu va ajuta la cresterea jucatorilor de sezonul viitor: DR Avram Norbert, 18 ani, 6/9/3, 1*? pai ar fi bai, pentru ca asta e jucatorul meu si a fost amenintat pe chat ca-si va pierde prietenia unui anume personaj, daca imi joaca vreun jucator. ideea e ca, pentru mine, jucatorul nu este important, chiar daca estimez ca are LA 9,9, pentru ca am un DR mai bun, asa ca e la vanzare, deci orice meci la u21 nu mi-ar aduce niciun beneficiu, din moment ce el nu va juca niciodata oficiale la mine.

4. DC B?rsan Sorin, 16 ani, 7/8/5, 2*. LA 8, nici macar printre primii jucatori cu LA 8? ce naiba, am ajuns sa crestem LA 8, ca viitor al U21? dar apartine lui pancone. acum se explica.

5. DC Boeru Cosmin, 18 ani, 5/10/3, 2*. asa mai merge. pacat ca proprietarul nu face amicale. domnul selectioner, este datoria dvs sa il convingeti sa faca, daca tot va intereseaza viitorul indepartat, mai mult decat sezonul viitor!

6. DC Olteanu Laurentiu, 17 ani, 3/9/4, 1*. e al 3-lea DC, in ordinea LA, dintre cei care sunt 'potentiali'

7. DC Diculescu Alexe, 17 ani, 3/10/3, 1*. asta da, macar e cel mai bun dintre 'potentiali'

8. DL Satmareanu Filimon, 17 ani, 9?/11/5, 2*. in sfarsit, un jucator care trebuie, neaparat sa fie in lot. si sa joace tot, dar tare mi-e teama...

9. DMR Borcea Nicu, 19 ani, 4/10/3, 2*. avand 19 ani, va putea participa doar la mondialul de sezonul viitor. e la cockalar, care a rarit-o cu amicalele. probabil asteapta sa-si ia antrenamentul de la u21, nu de la club.

ce facem cu un CA4, la mondial? ma rog, sa zicem CA 6, sezonul viitor. e adevarat, n-avem DMR-i, dar daca ne trebuie neaparat om pe pozitia aia, intr-un meci, atunci DR Stoicovici, care va fi cel putin CA 11, chiar si cu penalizarea ca nu joaca pe pozitie naturala, tot ar fi net superior unui CA 6. ceea ce ma aduce inapoi la al meu DR Avram, care este acum CA 6, deci pana sezonul viitor mai are de pus pe el si poate fi o rezerva buna, pentru DR Stoicovici, ca apoi, in urmatorul mandat, sa fie titular. dar nu e loc pentru el, din cauza amenintarilor de pe chat. cum ar fi ca domnul selectioner sa piarda sustinerea unui user? depinde cate voturi i-a donat acel user. in cazul de fata, proprietarul lui Borcea a dus greul "campaniei".

10. DMC Savu Horatiu, 18 ani, 5/10/3, 1*. cel mai bun DMC, e bun.

11. DML Ciocan Victoras, 19 ani, 9?/11/4, 4*. LA 11, clar de jucat. nu-mi fac griji, va juca, doar e al cui trebuie.

12. MR Barboianu Romeo, 17 ani, 5/9/4, 1*. la vremea lui, de ce nu? acum, insa, il avem pe MR Zanfir Patric, 19 ani, 9-10/11/4, 4*, care nu e in niciuna din nationale. e LA 11, care ia antrenament. cum explica domnul selectioner ca nu vrea sa ajute nici u21, nici NT?

13. ML, AML Cristeascu Madalin, 19 ani, 7/9/3, 3*. acest jucator va putea participa doar la urmatorul mondial de u21, cand, in cel mai bun caz, ar putea fi CA 8. sunt 2 AML-i care pot juca doar la mondialul urmator, mai buni decat acest jucator. cu tot cu penalizare, ei ar fi mai buni, pe ML, decat va putea fi Cristeascu. AML Serbanoiu Crin, 20 ani, 10/10/4, 4*, cu galben pe ML si AML Multescu Alberto, 20 ani, 10/10/6, 5*, cu rosu pe ML (si care mai are putin, pana la CA 11, dar are o mare problema, e jucatorul meu).

culmea este ca, acum 2 sezoane, la u21 n-a functionat schema de acum, in care sa joace cei de 18 ani. de fapt, n-a functionat, pentru jucatorul meu, desi era aproape la 1 mil valoare, inca de pe atunci si remusica a avut nevoie de el, la mondial. a prins cateva meciuri doar la inceput, cand a mers, din inertie, echipa setata de calculator. din moment ce nu m-a ajutat sa-l cresc, nici eu nu l-am ajutat la mondial. s-a incapatanat sa-l bage vreo 5 minute, de vreo 2 ori, apoi am zis sa speculez, daca tot il vrea, asa ca i l-am lasat, in calificari, ca si daca ar fi setat echipa legat la ochi, tot ar fi trecut mai departe. apoi i-am scazut conditia sub 50 si game over. abia a reusit sa treaca, cu multe emotii si mult noroc, de grupe.

exact la fel se va intampla si sezonul viitor, domnul selectioner! nu contribui la cresterea jucatorului, nu beneficiezi de el. eu castig mai mult, daca il tin cu antrenament very heavy, un sezon, decat daca joaca in u21, toate meciurile, pana in finala. prin urmare, te sfatuiesc sa te orientezi spre Serbanoiu, pentru ca Multescu va avea conditie sub 50, tot sezonul viitor.

14. MC, AMC Anca Danut, 16 ani, 4/8/5, 1*. LA 8 la nationala?! ridicol!

15. MC Serbanoiu Madalin, 18 ani, 5/9/3, 1*. doar de dragul exemplului, uite un alt MC, de 18 ani, 9/3, dar cu 2* si zecimale mai bune, pentru acel LA9: Filip Madalin

16. MC Solomon Emilian, 18 ani, 7/11/4, 3*. doar el si Fulga ar trebui sa joace, ca MC, tot sezonul asta. ma intreb daca Solomon e in lot de ochii lumii sau chiar va juca. n-as pune nicio para chioara pe a juca

17. MC Oprea Lucretiu, 17 ani, 7/9/3, 2*. iata explicatia pentru faptul ca se selectioneaza (aparent) 'potentiali'! si explicatia faptului ca se selectioneaza LA 8! pentru a avea loc 'baiatul' selectionerului. in timp ce Fulga Petre, 20 ani, 9-10/12/3, 5*, nu e in nicio nationala!!! sa-ti fie rusine, domnul selectioner!

m-am plictisit sa-i mai compar si pe ceilalti. macar nu mai e niciun LA 8. dar il asteptam pe Negru Toader, in locul lui Savu Horatiu.

aveti cuvantul, domnul selectioner!

65
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: cheater reporting
« on: February 27, 2016, 02:46:07 PM »
transfer history of RAPID OBSESION


5 transfers to Botev Plovdiv
2 transfers to San Martin Formosa
2 transfers to Boavista (LOCRI is the previous name of RAPID OBSESION)
3 transfers to Logrones
5 transfers to     Solin
4 transfers to Perak
2 transfers to     Hangzhou
5 transfers to     Turnovo
2 transfers to PRO Titan
2 transfers to Daegu
2 transfers to Admira Praha
1 transfer to Baloch
1 transfer to Al Sareeh
1 transfer to Vaduz
1 transfer to Roda JC (team that has switched it's focus on financing Spargatorul De Buci Arad - see previous post)
1 transfer to Novi Sad
1 transfer to Kocaelispor

plus 1 transfer each, to teams with only one player bought, ever:
 Durham
Paksi SE
FC Emmen
Hottin
Sousse Tigers
Senica
Bistrica
Halmstads BK
DC United
Valur
Fovu Club
CS Herediano

and many, many others. i got tired of all this copy-paste, here. in the last 2 years, almost all his transfers are cheated and the amount stolen is at least 39.000.000 G

apparently, his last honest transfer dates back to over a year ago.

notice the fact that almost all those teams were created in july-august 2013. that's 2 and a half years ago and he waited all this time to cash in!
by this method, he managed to upgrade quite a few facilities to the best.

66
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: cheater reporting
« on: February 27, 2016, 12:49:58 PM »
transfer history of Spargatorul De Buci Arad


he transferred 8 players to: Fc CFR1907 Cluj
he transferred 7 players to: A.S Minerul Jilt Matasari
he transferred 3 players to: F C Luceafarul
he transferred 3 players to: Muresana Mandruloc


 10.893.000 G cheated

there are other teams, apparently created with the single purpose of making one transfer:
Kaya, that has only one transfer,
Home Farm, also one transfer.


also, a very important aspect about team Spargatorul De Buci: the name of the team translates to: buttocks cracker (butt cracker). it's an indecent spin or the name of the ballet: nutcracker.

he tried this name on other online managers and all of the game masters changed his team name.

67
I hope that you get any notification about your car assurance expiration...if not, please check it right now because driving a car with no assurance, in many countries it's a crime!!  ;)

Come on guys, unhappy or not unhappy status is just a detail...Anyway, now that all uncareful managers have been forgiven, let's look forward and wish an happy season to all of You!!  8)

as a matter of fact, the insurance agent calls me a few weeks before renewal, every year, to arrange a day when i can pay for the next year. he works on commission, so it's his best interest, also.


there is no justice

The rollback cost me 60K


I have an old player that could not be released or sold so I did not renew his contract. Now he is still on my team and still cannot be released or sold (2/5/1) and it will cost me 60K in wages this season!
 >:(


sorry, buddy! have you tried writing to admin and explain that you intentionally allowed his contract to expire and you wanted him fired? maybe he will fire him, for you.

i hope he will take care of your problem.

68
i assume your questions are rhetorical.

i believe that, judging by evidence given by the disaster that just happened, the unh status is a necessity much greater that any one of us conceived. newbies or seasoned users, such an enormous amount of them needed that unh status to remind them to renew the contracts. and yes, i do consider that almost all of them lost players by accident, not because they wanted to save money and wait until the end of the season.

i don't know if other games do the same, reminding every season about the renewal. i'm curious, are there games that leave this issue completely on the user's shoulders, without providing any kind of a warning that they are about to lose a players, in case they don't take action?

69
ps: i wasn't thinking of you deleting my messages. i know you are better than that

you should add to that list of persons that are able to delete posts:
1. admin
2. moderators
3. the creator of the post
4. the creator of the topic

70
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: WHEN ELECTION OF U21 ??????
« on: February 24, 2016, 11:00:51 AM »
i reminded him, with another e-mail, yesterday.

the elections are on, now. thankfully...

71
i've already covered my position regarding getting high value players back. see the last post, with the 3 possible scenarios. my conclusion stand. you can't know what a user would do, if he would have the red [UNH] warning for the entire season. he might just renew, at the end of the season or at the first hour after the update. and the update is one of the regular things that were supposed to happen and it should be written in the rules, if the rules would be updated. it's normal to remind the users about contracts and also normal for a player to ask for a higher wage, if his skills are better, or else, just play 7% worse.

that concludes the fairness and necessity of having the [UNH] update.

about zsoca, the main romanian cheater, i'm kinda used to him cheating and i'm punishing him the only way i can, without breaking the rules: i mots him. i know admin will not punish him, but, from time to time, i need to remind other of his actions. he has taken another approach: he stopped writing on the romanian chat, so that the romanian users would forget him, so he can stay out of the spotlight.

however, the 2 situations cannot be similar. the cheaters do something wrong, intentionally, to destroy other user's fun, while those that lost players didn't do it intentionally and they had no intention to destroy other user's fun of playing the game. they were victims of admin's failure to run an update.

i understand that the users that lost players have an advantage, now, in keeping the players with the same salary. i agree, it's not fair for them to keep those salaries, but i'm ok with it, given the alternative of them not having the players in their teams and leaving the game.

that's why i keep saying: just let them be. it's the smaller worse of the 2 situations.

72
Mihut, i don't know who deleted your messages, but just in case you suggest it was me, all i can say is that i were not, i don't need to do it, i mean my position has beennclear enough and i think that despite what you tought initially, i think my move was right actually, but don't you worry, i have no intenction to ask a penalty for you because you will pay more money than me in upcoming seasons  :)

Now, back to the main topic: some players might not be worth 250k penalty, but other players should worth a lot more.
For ANY team, their players are their main capital. If you lose 2 players worth more than a million in est. value or really high LA players, we all know that their value IN THE MARKET is worth millions: was a 10/12/4 player worth 250k for you? If that player owner wants to sell his player, he can get 12M really easily, some people never saw 12M in their accounts in 7 or 8 seasons playing, so would you consider a 250k penalty something "fair"?
I agree that asking 250k for having a CA5 player back is ridiculous, but having a LA12 player back for even 5M as a penalty is a great deal, of course it might be better than having the player back for free, but if that's the case, any of us would be happy if the GM gives any manager a LA12 player for 5M.
And to be clear, i am not asking a high LA player or some money back as compensation, i only want that those managers who got back MILLIONS in players, have to deal with something in exchange of those players that shouldn't be theirs anymore.


right. they might get back millions, but let's analyze the complete situation:

if the update would have happened, last season, a user with a 10/12/4 player would:

1. most likely: want to benefit from his ca 10 power. that would make him renew the contract, to not receive the (approximately) 7% [UNH] penalty, therefore keeping his player;

2. second most likely: in case he doesn't want to renew, the user would have the [UNH] red warning in his sight, the entire season, making it extremely likely to renew, after the league matches were over, therefore keeping his player;

3. third and the most unlikely: he would not renew and despite the red warning, he would forget about renewing, at the end of the season, therefore losing his player.

i find the chance of that user to lose his player as extremely small, impossible to quantify into a penalty and impossible to decide to whom and why should it be applied.

and about you initial move, yes, it was right, just as i think mine was right and i don't think we should receive any award for doing what's right for our teams. nor anybody in this game.

73
let me come back with a part of my last post, that was deleted by someone who cannot respect a different point of view, a point of view well argumented:

here is the only way of making justice: take all the players saved, calculate the salary they were supposed to have, a season ago, based on the skills they used to have, a season ago, multiply by 18 weeks and deduct from the team. also, that salary was supposed to be today's salary.

the 250k penalty for each saved player is nonsense, since many, many players, don't have a salary increase that would justify 250k. some players only ask for 100G increase, making the entire season difference of 1800G. why deduct 250k, for 1,8k difference? not fair. it would only create more injustice

74
Mihut no replies merits, you're stupid, then blot your posts. not to recognize that in this way is penalized those who did the contracts as regulation it is obtuse

and the best way possible of carrying this argument is for you to call me stupid and for some moderator to censor me. i have not called you stupid, why are my posts being deleted?

later edit: as i have just found out, it wasn't a moderator deleting my posts, it was spolentino

75
Mihut, you are master of not wanting any benefit. But I ask you not to be penalized by the fact that they have spent more money than others who have saved on salaries and with that money they did other things that I could not do. This seems JUSTICE


spolentino, if you want justice, don't come here asking for more injustice!

your proposal, with 250k per player or 2 mil fee is total injustice! you cannot claim that 250k per player is fair, because that would mean that every player was supposed to have a salary increase of about 14k. only young players, that were receiving good training, get this increase in salary. how about all the players already maxed out, that usually request almost the same salary, maybe a few tenths or hundreds of G more? why would anyone pay 250k, for a player that maybe would ask, for example, for 50 G increase? this means the user saved 900 G per season, but you want to deduct 250k. total injustice.

the only fair way to make things right would be to take every player that was saved (reinstated), calculate the salary he was supposed to have, exactly 1 season ago, multiply that by 18 weeks and deduct the money from the owner.

i don't think it's possible, so everything better stay exactly as it is, right now. doing anything else would only make things worse, not better.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5