Show Posts

1

Player Transfer Ads / PLAYERS ON SALE !! PRICE NEGOTIABLE

« on: April 27, 2014, 12:10:56 PM »

2

General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Continued daily progress of players with PR 1 and 2 after CA7+

« on: April 07, 2014, 08:44:19 AM »

I think the solution for this would be introducing some kind of a training camp where youngsters would get an increase in training . For example, you send a player to 2 week camp, pay some kind of fee ( say 100 000 ) and he gets this bonus. Put limit on 3 players a season and give bonuses according to PR.

PR 1 - 70 %
PR 2 - 50 %
PR 3 - 40 %
PR 4 - 30 %
PR 5 - 20 %
PR 6 - 10 %

The problem with training is that players MUST play matches in order to develop no matter what PR are they.

So you must sometimes sacrifice a result in order to give them playing time and if you have 4-5 or even more, some of them can get match practice only in friendly games which is not enough if you train LA2 or 3 player.

3

General Discussion(English Only) / Re: lets start with the youths we have obtained :P

« on: December 23, 2013, 12:07:57 PM »

You can wait for 2 months but if you dont get good players you ll have to pay for another ones and wait again for 2 months.. Thats 4 months or bacically a season. You are missing one entire season of training and if he was younger then 18 you missed a nice training bonus

Say that you get 19y 3 / 10 /3 player, that will be at the season end so you can already make it a 20y old.

He ll never reach that LA10

And you re an idiot Mathews. This is a forum, everyone is entitled to say their opinion. Deal with it.

4

General Discussion(English Only) / Re: lets start with the fucking youths we have obtained :P

« on: December 22, 2013, 11:18:05 PM »

Quote from: MathewsPateras on December 22, 2013, 07:50:24 PM

the best

3/5/3 3/7/3, 3/7/3, 3/7/4, 3/7/4, 3/7/5, 6/7/3. every season same.

Maybe you didnt get LA8+ but I ll rather have LA7 PR 3 then LA8-9 PR 2

If you have patience to train those LA7 , you re looking at some nice players and nice cash...

I would be satisfied with those pulls, considering the standards. Look around and you ll see people getting much worse players with Best and VG academy, and probability difference of getting TOP talent between VG and Best is not that high really, no matter the costs for building Best academy.

Thats why I stick with VG although I did have money to build the Best one...

Game simply forces you to buy tokens and you cant expect Top talents from Best Academy without tokens.

I dont want to pay

5

Suggestions/Bugs / Re: MOTS

« on: November 22, 2013, 02:00:34 AM »

MOTS should stay but it would probably be better to have one MOTS

As for weaker leagues and clubs , let them choose how to use their MOTS. You wont be using MOTS if you re in lower league playing with bots. You ll normally save it for the cup game. If you are in top level of weaker leagues and have complete domination you ll clearly save it for WC.
I mean does it make sense playing " match of the season " with the team that is weaker then you..

More stronger your team and more competetive your domestic league / cup is, more MOTSes against you.

If a team plays for example in third level of XYZ league and dominates it he ll use that MOTS in league cup against the team in top level. That is, in fact, the true meaning "match of the season " for that club.. Imagine Rotherham playing in FA Cup against Arsenal.

You wont beat that team that easy but still, the outcome depends on that "random" factor. You ll maybe fail to score from 7-8 shots and the opponent will score from one or two but the idea is that MOTS alone will not give him the win. He needs both MOTS and luck but you ll see that happening all over the time in real world. Sometimes its simply not your day no matter how better you are

6

Player Transfer Ads / Players For Sale

« on: August 25, 2013, 01:13:27 AM »

Julio López DMC 4 / 7 / 2 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5953193

Ryota Tanaka, DR, 4 / 6 / 2 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5087769

Mateja Trokić, FC, 3 / 9 / 2 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=6741240 ONLY 950K !!!!

Ty Zhong, DMC, 2 / 6 / 3 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5766311

Witaya Tanasugarn, FC, 4 / 6 / 3 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5693714

Jelenko Dedić, DC, 3 / 6 / 2 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=6741239

7

General Discussion(English Only) / Re: PR prob in VG standard Academy

« on: April 01, 2013, 10:51:20 AM »

I pulled 4 players only since I have too many players anyway. Will wait for the reports for the rest of them..
2 / 4 / 3
3/ 7 / 2
3 / 8 / 3
3 / 5 / 3

In normal circumstances I wouldn't be satisfied but seeing other people"s polls I think I should be happy with LA 8 PR 3 player...
Seems the number of players with 5+ PR has decreased too , which is a right thing I think... With lower PR players should invest more in training grounds and coaches in order to train those LA 8 + players well...

8

ARCHIVE / Re: [Gokickoff Update] Changes in the player transfer system (Launch after season 7)

« on: March 25, 2013, 11:26:03 AM »

NO NO NO NO

You re messing the transfer system even more. Why complicate things ?

Even the older players dont get this system right, how will a newbie get along with it..

This is a bad idea.. It will work in short term but in long term it will cause problems just like this wage bid.

Remove the wage bid option and that's it.
Leave the transfer tax as it is and put some kind of limit of how much players you can trade in some time span. Say 5 players in 90 days period, after which you re obligated to pay extra 5% tax for the next player you sell.

Leave it simple

9

Player Transfer Ads / LA 6 - 8 Players OPEN TRANSFER

« on: December 25, 2012, 10:10:46 AM »

I m selling some of my talents so if you are interested in some of them just pm me so we could arrange a deal.

Gorden Arkwright 3 / 8 / 3 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5661997

Vimol Ramasut 2 / 7 / 2 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=4089515

Patipaan Poontarat 2 / 6 / 3 http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=5766116

I m too lazy for screenshots

I ll send ya one if you re interested in specific player

10

ARCHIVE / Re: [Gokickoff Update] Changes in the player transfer system (Launch date: 09/09/12)

« on: September 09, 2012, 06:47:00 PM »

I like the changes and I really like the wage + bid idea. However, I think that there should be some kind of limit on wages, according to actual value of a player. Newcomers and inexperienced players could go bankrupt because of the bad finance management, especially if they pay high wages for average players, just because they lack funds for better ones.

Now, can you clear something for me. When I want to buy a player who"s wage is 800 do I need to offer a higher wage then 800 or I can offer less ?

11

Bosnia and Herzegovina / Re: Nacionalni tim BIH U-21

« on: February 03, 2012, 03:33:33 PM »

Evo jedan moj igrac a uskoro mozda i ne. Postavio sam mozda i preveliku cijenu ali jebaji ga, polako cu spustati ako ne prodje sad...

http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=2436993

12

Bosnia and Herzegovina / Re: Reprezentacija BiH

« on: January 18, 2012, 10:21:49 AM »

Ne kontam sto su stavili da iz akademije dobijas i igrace ostalih nacionalnosti. Ja dobio makedonca,scivarca, bugarina....

The Official GoKickOff Online Community Forums

News:

Messages - totasef