Author Topic: Bug - Signing on Fee required  (Read 10428 times)

Littmann

  • National Team
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
    • View Profile
Re: Bug - Signing on Fee required
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2014, 07:29:13 AM »
Admin may not consider this a big deal since most of these signing-on fees are fairly small.
But look at this one:


The player is 30 years of age and with an est. value of just 569K. With the a 1.016.920G signing on fee, I wonder if the player could be sold even for just 100G!

As this clearly demonstrates, this is NOT a minor bug. Please be aware, admin.

This is not bug. It`s fee because of his wage. I had to sell my 650 000 Estimated Value,27 years old player for 100 G becuse his SOF was over 500 000 G and none wanted to pay additionaly 600 000 or 750 000 G for transfer.I contacted admin who said to me that is not the bug.
Former Bosnia and Herzegovina NT Manager

Brian Clough

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Team
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
  • GKO Moderator
    • View Profile
    • Coolsport.tv - free live streaming football and other sports with great English chat...join us!
Re: Bug - Signing on Fee required
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2014, 02:48:33 PM »
Admin may not consider this a big deal since most of these signing-on fees are fairly small.
But look at this one:


The player is 30 years of age and with an est. value of just 569K. With the a 1.016.920G signing on fee, I wonder if the player could be sold even for just 100G!

As this clearly demonstrates, this is NOT a minor bug. Please be aware, admin.

This is not bug. It`s fee because of his wage. I had to sell my 650 000 Estimated Value,27 years old player for 100 G becuse his SOF was over 500 000 G and none wanted to pay additionaly 600 000 or 750 000 G for transfer.I contacted admin who said to me that is not the bug.

But the system was (supposedly) designed so there would be no signing on fee if wages are not increased from bidding. No manager has bid on this player and his base wages have not been raised. Perhaps admin thought your player's wage had been raised by bidding?
« Last Edit: May 07, 2014, 09:18:45 PM by Brian Clough »
Never sacrifice passion for glory!

Littmann

  • National Team
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
    • View Profile
Re: Bug - Signing on Fee required
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2014, 04:36:54 PM »
No matter.His basic wage shouldn't be over 20000 but is.System calculates fee from previous minimum wage requirement and keeps it until player retires.Minimum wage for this player should be probably around 10 000.Last time he was transfered wage rised from minimal to this one.Signing on fee (for that difference) will be paid on every next transfer.
Former Bosnia and Herzegovina NT Manager

Brian Clough

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Team
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
  • GKO Moderator
    • View Profile
    • Coolsport.tv - free live streaming football and other sports with great English chat...join us!
Re: Bug - Signing on Fee required
« Reply #28 on: May 07, 2014, 05:51:41 PM »
No matter.His basic wage shouldn't be over 20000 but is.System calculates fee from previous minimum wage requirement and keeps it until player retires.Minimum wage for this player should be probably around 10 000.Last time he was transfered wage rised from minimal to this one.Signing on fee (for that difference) will be paid on every next transfer.

Well for me this is a bug...or at least a shortcoming...in the system. Only the manager who raises the wages should have to pay the (full) signing on fee, at least for older players (>29)

Also I think this case may be a combination of the high wage issue you mentioned AND the real bug, which ascribes a signing on fee when the player's wages fall at age 30+
 :-\
Never sacrifice passion for glory!

Littmann

  • National Team
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
    • View Profile
Re: Bug - Signing on Fee required
« Reply #29 on: May 07, 2014, 06:49:56 PM »
No matter.His basic wage shouldn't be over 20000 but is.System calculates fee from previous minimum wage requirement and keeps it until player retires.Minimum wage for this player should be probably around 10 000.Last time he was transfered wage rised from minimal to this one.Signing on fee (for that difference) will be paid on every next transfer.

Well for me this is a bug...or at least a shortcoming...in the system. Only the manager who raises the wages should have to pay the (full) signing on fee, at least for older players (>29)

Also I think this case may be a combination of the high wage issue you mentioned AND the real bug, which ascribes a signing on fee when the player's wages fall at age 30+
 :-\

Maybe,but I tell you why I had to sell player with Estimated Value over 600 000 for 100 G.
Former Bosnia and Herzegovina NT Manager

Levan

  • National Team
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
    • Digital Studio 9
Signing on fee needs tweaking
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2014, 07:27:45 PM »
 I rarely sell or acquire players, but few days ago I decided to try my luck with a player before I would wave him

Few hours ago I been greeted with this interesting massage



Believe me, that player was nothing special (he was rubbish)  sure his current ability was 4 but spending more than 100 - 7,000 to acquire that player is an overkill, the manager who got that player spent 100 $ + 29800 $ to acquire a 30 year old player that did not have any experience or outstanding abilities .

First i thought that it was managers fault to spent additional 29800 $ on Signing and I thought there would be no chance that the system would require such high price on a transfer. So I started searching for old players and noticed that fee was just too high

Here is one example:



You can see an old veteran player that can be used in a low level league, I am a huge believer in experienced players and I use them, so based on this for a right price I can buy a similar player like this if the price is right (around 1000$)

However when  I looked at his Signing on fee I think it is almost impossible to move a player like him because the fee is just too high, and this is just one example all the players I looked at that are around the same age have tremendous Signing fee



Based on all the above I believe Signing on fee re tweaked. Because acquiring a player above 29 years is a waste of money ( I am not even talking about how fast does players ability drop, which is a huge mistake, in our era players can easily play up to 34)

Well that is what I think

Thank you for your time
« Last Edit: September 28, 2014, 07:31:15 PM by Levan »

spamrulez

  • Legendary Team
  • *****
  • Posts: 650
    • View Profile
Re: Signing on fee needs tweaking
« Reply #31 on: September 29, 2014, 06:39:27 AM »
This happens when the wages are bidded instead of the club price.

It's something stupid.

I guess that the formula for winning the bid should be changed and that the fees in some percentage should be assigned to the club that's selling the player.
Spam Rulez manager of Astronomy Domine
an italian team since season 1

Levan

  • National Team
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
    • Digital Studio 9
Re: Signing on fee needs tweaking
« Reply #32 on: September 29, 2014, 04:10:49 PM »
This happens when the wages are bidded instead of the club price.

It's something stupid.

I guess that the formula for winning the bid should be changed and that the fees in some percentage should be assigned to the club that's selling the player.

Totally agree

oillyspu

  • Youth team
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Signing on fee needs tweaking
« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2014, 11:43:24 AM »
Posted law is rubbing me very much. Ah, I love it It is really good post