51
Norway / Re: Norwegian u21 tornament interesting?
« on: October 19, 2014, 10:03:18 AM »
Anyone?
Server Time (UTC +0000)
News:
Playing more than one account is strictly prohibited.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
52
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: I have the worst best academy... That sucks.
« on: October 18, 2014, 06:35:04 AM »
I've also had LA 5-6 players from my "best" academy, it sucks! What I'm wondering is why are these players even in the academy... I know this is not the fact, but one would think that players get into the academy because they have some kind of skill or potential. Then why is there LA 6 players in the best academies? If I could choose now I wouldn't accept anyone into the academy below LA8, even if that means no one comes in a whole season.
On the other hand, one of my best players and my captain is a LA6
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=4036482
On the other hand, one of my best players and my captain is a LA6
http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=4036482
53
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: how much can he worth?
« on: October 18, 2014, 06:29:44 AM »
I'm sorry, but I wouldn't buy him, even if he is 3/10/4... He's 19 yo and won't reach his LA, perhaps CA 6-7 by the time he's 21... I don't think you'll find any serious buyers, but some rookie might jump on him 
But 19 yo and PR 3... It's a bit strange he got into the academy in the first place
But 19 yo and PR 3... It's a bit strange he got into the academy in the first place
54
Norway / Re: Norwegian u21 tornament interesting?
« on: October 17, 2014, 08:54:47 AM »
Anyone ready this time around? I'll join another league if not...
55
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: So the transfer system sucks
« on: October 14, 2014, 09:12:16 AM »
Bids will rise when it nears ending
56
Norway / Re: Norwegian u21 tornament interesting?
« on: October 10, 2014, 03:37:40 PM »
I'm still ready, but if others aren't I say the ones who are form a league and accept someone else.
58
Norway / Re: Norwegian u21 tornament interesting?
« on: September 27, 2014, 04:19:14 PM »
Ok, did not know. Anyone else not ready?
61
Norway / Re: Norwegian u21 tornament interesting?
« on: September 25, 2014, 06:53:45 AM »
Sure, but I'm not sure I can play only u21-players...
62
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Red Card n Injuries in this new season, Worsen?
« on: September 22, 2014, 09:52:36 AM »
Haven't noticed anything this season, but got some long injuries last season..
63
Need help ? / Re: How are NT players selected ???
« on: September 10, 2014, 03:46:57 PM »
Also bots don't consider dmr/l/c or amr/l/c, these players never get to play no matter how good they are... 
65
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Season 12
« on: September 08, 2014, 06:58:45 PM »
First place in Norway gets 1000000.. Shouldn't be different in other leagues.
66
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Season 12
« on: September 08, 2014, 05:11:10 PM »
I got 600000 for 3rd place...
67
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Season 12
« on: September 07, 2014, 06:10:46 PM »
Best academy isn't always a good thing. I've pulled 4 players this season, none better than LA 7. Stupid academy is costing me somewhere around 1mill a year not to mention the millions it took to build. But I have to admitt, it is kinda exiting
68
Suggestions/Bugs / Re: money lending system
« on: September 06, 2014, 08:51:55 AM »
Alot of temperature in this thread, and rightly so.
Opinions are always welcome, bad aswell as good
Opinions are always welcome, bad aswell as good
69
Suggestions/Bugs / Re: money lending system
« on: September 03, 2014, 10:22:28 AM »
I'm sorry, but I still don't get your point... So you save up 1 mill (which by the way would suffice by far) and it's spent, well that's the way for everyone and a part of the game... Can't see why this is unfair... Wouldn't be much fun if economy handling was too easy either.
72
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Transfer system
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:50:05 AM »
Forgot to mention that I do agree that the current transfer system isn't optimal...
73
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Transfer system
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:46:53 AM »
I somewhat agree with Jansen... People should be able to attract high class players by giving high salaries, just look at Falcao in RL. If your finance can handle it, why not? If I were a player I'd surely consider it if one club offered 10000 p/w and another 30000 p/w. However, the problem may be that alot of the transfers being made are being made by relatively new clubs witout time perspective in the game. Meaning some of them may quit after a season or two and thus the player is "wasted" for those who wish to build a strong team over time.
A personal example: Before this season I "bought" a free player (http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=4124735) giving him a salary of 50000 and with that a signon fee of 2000000. This might've been a bit much, I realise that, but he's costing me somewhere around 1,6mill a season in salaries times 5 which is the contract time = 8mill + 2mill signing = 10mill. I can let him go after 5 years or perhaps even sell him for 1-2mill (because of his salary I probably won't get much). But 10mill for a 1,4mill player isn't really that expensive... just alittle, maybe..
Perhaps players worth 1m+ should have some sense not to sign for low-rated clubs? I doubt Falcao would've signed for say Cardif just because that indian guy decided to open his wallet. This again would create an unfairness in obtaining these players because already good teams would become better, but atleast they have some sense when it comes to economy and where they want to put their cash.
A personal example: Before this season I "bought" a free player (http://www.gokickoff.com/team_player_detail.php?player_id=4124735) giving him a salary of 50000 and with that a signon fee of 2000000. This might've been a bit much, I realise that, but he's costing me somewhere around 1,6mill a season in salaries times 5 which is the contract time = 8mill + 2mill signing = 10mill. I can let him go after 5 years or perhaps even sell him for 1-2mill (because of his salary I probably won't get much). But 10mill for a 1,4mill player isn't really that expensive... just alittle, maybe..
Perhaps players worth 1m+ should have some sense not to sign for low-rated clubs? I doubt Falcao would've signed for say Cardif just because that indian guy decided to open his wallet. This again would create an unfairness in obtaining these players because already good teams would become better, but atleast they have some sense when it comes to economy and where they want to put their cash.
75
General Discussion(English Only) / Re: Debt
« on: August 24, 2014, 12:17:16 PM »
Bonuses are paid out next season